HTML validator is used for checking syntax and after testing various HTML validators CSE HTML Validator seems to be the best. W3C Validator has many issues such as syntax error and missing. While testing with recent versions the conclusion is that W3C Validator creates an Interoperable page with many problems and this validator seems to have too many issues.
W3C Validators claim to be base upon SGML parsers. SGML parsers can check a limited number of problems and they adhere to strictly to the specifications and ignore many things supported
We've provided examples below that show that CSE HTML Validator can find problems and issues that other syntax checkers and validators (such as the popular W3C HTML Validator) cannot find. The testing was done with recent versions of CSE HTML Validator. Validate the source HTML document using the W3C HTML Validator and see how many problems/issues it misses (it misses ALL of them as of July 9, 2007). Even with all these issues, the W3C validator says that you may want to place an icon on your page to show your readers that you've taken the care to
The WDG HTML Validator is similar in many ways to the W3C HTML Validation Service. Most of the previous differences between the two validators have disappeared with recent development of the W3C validator. The errors reported are the same in virtually all cases. However, some minor differences may arise:
*
The WDG HTML Validator gives warnings for valid but dangerous HTML: unclosed start-tags (e.g., <p><img src=foo alt=bar</p>), unclosed end-tags (e.g., <p><em>foo</em</p>), empty start and end-tags (e.g.,
RSS/XML